Dicaria Console Start free
English
English 中文

Use cases — Dicaria

Use cases

Three live scenarios, reproducible within the free allowance.

Scenarios below are the product's real delivery form; row values are placeholder illustrations — this site does not showcase specific companies' data. The live CLI demos for these scenarios run against China-scope public data and are therefore shown on the zh-CN site; the international free allowance ships batch snapshots + detail-table exports (the four-part layering T1/T2/T3 with mirror hashes included). Use cases for other domains land as their exports go live.

Supplier vetting

Task & riskBefore onboarding a supplier you need to confirm its certified qualifications and whether they are still valid — with conclusions that survive audit questioning.
DeliveryExport a sourced candidate/review list by qualification type and region: every row a conclusion plus a direct link to the gazette file, with historical batches and re-check rows preserved (detail-table form; the full four-part layering with quotes and mirror hashes ships with the free allowance and the delivery environment).

Boundary: "Valid" = the most recent gazette status; re-check expiry follows the next gazette. Qualification history is never deleted — expiry reads from the status field, so expired qualifications never mix into the valid set.

Target-set screening

Task & riskDraw a batch of target companies under a policy scope (e.g. a government-published factory or award roster) where the list traces back to the gazette original — not an aggregator dump of unknown origin.
DeliveryQualification × region × year filters export a sourced row list; the same company appears once per batch and year, so the screening scope can be re-checked directly.

Boundary: Coverage follows the sources: a result set is a "re-checkable subset of disclosed rosters", not an exhaustive universe of that qualification — not covered ≠ non-compliant.

Disclosure-relation research

Task & riskResearch a listed company’s customers, suppliers, and group structure with quotation-level evidence — not a one-line conclusion from a graph database.
DeliveryEntity-anchored relation expansion: every edge carries the verbatim disclosure quote, the disclosure period, the equity share (where disclosed) and a direct announcement link; both directions are exported.

Boundary: Relations = direct disclosure proof: only relations stated in the announcement text are captured, no inferred "complete supply chain"; a relation holds as of its disclosure period — current standing is not promised.

The live CLI demos behind these scenarios run against China-scope public data — view them on the 中文. International delivery ships batch snapshots + detail-table exports under the same four-part contract.

Want your own scenario run? Sign up for a key